- An advertiser can copy an ad's text, visible path and links into another Google Ads account, so the ad looks the same while the advertiser Google names changes.
- Google's Ads Transparency Center gives each advertiser an ID (“AR” and 20 digits) and each ad a Last shown date, so a handover between accounts has dates attached.
- Names are a loose key. One legal name can sit under several IDs, and matching copy alone doesn't prove the same operator, since your own agency can run another account.
- Removing an affiliate from your programme isn't a Google suspension, so Google's Circumventing systems policy doesn't start there. The policy that fits advertising against your programme's rules is Unfair advantage.
- Follow the activity across identities, ask your network for a written answer on the new identity, the publisher and the orders, and set a recheck date.
Monday 12 October. Your brand search shows an ad headed “Yourbrand Official Sotre | Free UK Delivery”, typo and all. You raise it with your network, and a publisher is removed from your programme.
Thursday 15 October. The same headline is back, with the same misspelling and the same visible path. The advertiser Google names has changed.
A watch built on Monday's name misses Thursday completely. The way through is to follow the activity, not the name.
How an ad changes hands
An ad's text is just text. Anyone can type the same headline, description and visible path into another Google Ads account, with the same final URL behind it. The storefront stays familiar while the public advertiser record changes.
That record comes from advertiser verification. For a verified advertiser, the ad's disclosure and the Ads Transparency Center show its legal name (or an approved trade mark name), where it's based and a verified badge. On Search you reach it through the three-dot icon on desktop or the info icon on mobile. An advertiser that hasn't verified shows its payments profile name with an unverified badge. The guide to reading About this advertiser goes through each line of the panel.
An advertiser can verify as a person or an organisation. A person submits government photo ID, and the name shown is theirs, with their country but no address. Running ads on brand-related searches is one of the reasons Google lists for asking an advertiser to verify.
What carries over
When an ad moves, much of it usually moves with it. These are the things you can match:
- the ad text, word for word, typos included;
- the visible URL path;
- deep links into particular pages of your site;
- the affiliate ID and sub ID pattern in the final URL, which you see in your network's reports and in the page URLs GA4 records;
- sub IDs that carry search text;
- the landing-page template, where the ad goes to a publisher's page;
- the timing: the new account's ads starting soon after the old one's stop.
The Transparency Center keeps the dates
Google's Ads Transparency Center gives each advertiser a page with its own ID: “AR” followed by 20 digits, in the page's address. The page shows the legal name, where the advertiser is based, whether it's verified and roughly how many ads it has. You can search by advertiser or website, and filter by country and date.
Each ad's page shows when it was Last shown, its format, its variations, and the ad as it rendered: visible URL, headline and description. There's no first shown date, and no final URL, tracking parameter or keyword. The extra targeting and reach figures cover the EEA and Turkey, not the UK.
That's enough to put dates on a handover. Take the old advertiser's latest Last shown date, then filter the new one by date to find its earliest ads. Monday's record stops, Thursday's starts: a three-day gap you can write down.
Why it's easy to miss
A watch kept by name sees Monday's advertiser gone, and the network report shows the removed publisher's row no longer growing. Both say the removal worked.
Names are a loose key in both directions. One legal name can sit under several advertiser IDs: Google's own does. Accounts billed monthly to one payments profile under a manager account can all show the same verified name. Unverified names are free text, and some are web addresses or other companies' names. So a new ID doesn't mean a new person, and a shared name doesn't mean the same one.
Auction Insights won't flag it either. Its rows are labelled by display domain, not by account, so a change of account behind the same display domain needn't show up as anything new.
What it costs
The removal stops one row. It doesn't necessarily stop the commission.
- Commission on each eligible order
- £2.00
- Eligible orders a day through the new publisher
- 15
- Days from Thursday 15 to Saturday 31 October
- 17
- Commission the removal didn't stop
- £510.00
The old publisher's row has stopped growing, so the removal looks successful. The new row carries on the bill. Pending commission can be declined through your programme's process until the network's validation window (the time you have to approve or decline a tracked sale) closes. Paid commission rarely comes back (What you can do).
Where it shows in your own records
- Your network: publishers that joined after the removal, with their declared promotional method, site type, deep links and tracking reference pattern.
- GA4:
google / cpcsessions with campaign(not set)coming back after a gap, with the same query-string shape. The Landing page + query string dimension shows it. - Your site's own entry URLs, wherever they're logged: the same parameter names returning after a gap.
- The Ads Transparency Center: the advertiser IDs, their Last shown dates and the ads as they rendered.
- Your order data: the orders since the return, with their network order references.
Checking it isn't yours
Matching copy alone doesn't prove the same operator. Rule out the ordinary explanations first.
- Your agency, which can run ads from more than one account. Ask for the identities it's authorised to use and check the new name against them.
- Another team at your company, or a reseller, working from copy it was given.
- A different publisher copying a headline it saw working. Rendered ads are public in the Transparency Center.
- The same business under another of its IDs, or a common name shared by unrelated advertisers.
- A publisher whose company details changed. Changing the legal name on a billing profile triggers verification again.
- A sub-network's publisher, with the sub-network as the row in your report (Behind the network).
- An old campaign in another account, still running.
Where Google's rules come in
Google's Circumventing systems policy bars opening new accounts to get back in after a suspension, and creating new websites or accounts to show ads similar to ones already disapproved. Google treats these as egregious: suspension on detection, without warning, for good, with related accounts (on the same payment method, say) suspended too.
All of that starts from Google's own enforcement. Removing an affiliate from your programme isn't a Google suspension, and bidding on a brand name isn't against Google's rules. So a rejoin under a new name usually isn't circumvention in Google's sense.
The policy that fits is Unfair advantage. It lists “affiliates that advertise on Google Ads against the applicable affiliate program rules”, and Google warns at least seven days before any suspension. It also bars showing more than one ad for the same business or site in a single ad location. Two accounts showing the same ad there at once could come under that; one taking over after the other stops doesn't.
Give Google the specific advertiser, by name and Ads Transparency ID, and the terms that apply, through “Report ad” in the ad's three-dot menu or “Report this ad” in the Transparency Center. Neither means clicking the ad. A trade mark restriction follows the domain in the final URL, not the account, so it generally covers the new account's ads where they land on the same domain.
What to do
- In the Ads Transparency Center, search your brand name, then your domain, with the country set to the United Kingdom. List every advertiser ID, its name, whether it's verified and where it's based.
- Note the removed advertiser's latest Last shown date. Use the date filter on each new ID to find its earliest ads.
- Put the rendered ads side by side. Compare the headlines character by character, then the descriptions and visible paths.
- In your network, list the publishers that joined since the removal and compare them with the old one.
- In GA4, compare the query strings of returning
(not set)sessions with the old ones. - Send your network one message with the IDs, dates and ads. Ask for a written answer on the new identity, the underlying publisher and the affected orders, and set a recheck date against it.
- Where the ads are against your terms, report them to Google under Unfair advantage, with the advertiser and the clause.
Seeing it in Godotoro
Every ad Godotoro records shows the advertiser Google names for it, from “About this advertiser”: the verified name, where they're based and their Ads Transparency ID, with a link to their ads on the Ads Transparency Center. When Google lists an affiliate network's address for the click, Godotoro names the network.
Who's bidding gives each advertiser its first and last seen, the checks it was seen in and its distinct ads, so Monday's last sighting and Thursday's first sit in one table, with the text as it showed.
The address pane lists the advertisers the Ads Transparency Center shows for UK ads using your web address, whether Google verified each, how many ads, and when each was first listed. Godotoro describes what was seen; what it means under your terms is yours to decide. To see your own searches, check your brand.
The film's narration
- 0:03
Monday's ad is back on Thursday. Same headline. Same spelling mistake. The advertiser Google names has changed.
- 0:11
An advertiser can copy the ad text into another account, visible path and all. The storefront stays familiar while the public advertiser record changes. A watch for Monday's name alone can miss Thursday's return completely.
- 0:25
Google's Ads Transparency Center gives each advertiser a record with an ID, and each ad a Last shown date. Compare the old record's final date with the new sightings. The handover now has dates attached to it.
- 0:39
Put the rendered ads side by side. Compare the typo and the visible path. Separately, inspect entry URLs already recorded by your site: the same parameter names returning after a gap give your network another connection to examine.
- 0:55
In the network, look at publishers joining after a removal. Compare their declared promotional method and site type. Ask the network whether the new publisher's tracking references follow the same pattern as the old one's. Bring the advertiser IDs into that question.
- 1:10
Imagine the replacement starts earning the same two pounds on each eligible order. The old publisher's row has stopped growing, so the removal looks successful. The new row carries on the bill. You need to follow the activity across identities.
- 1:25
Matching copy alone doesn't prove the same operator; your agency can use another account too. Check its authorised identities, then ask the network to reconcile the records. A legal name can appear under more than one public advertiser ID.
- 1:40
Removing an affiliate from your programme isn't a Google suspension. Google's suspension evasion rules start with Google's own enforcement. For advertising against your programme rules, the relevant policy is Unfair advantage. Give Google the specific advertiser and the terms that apply.
- 1:57
Ask for a written answer covering the new identity, the underlying publisher and the affected orders. Set a recheck date against that answer. Watching only for the original name leaves the replacement outside the frame.
- 2:10
Godotoro shows the advertiser Google names, where they're based and their Ads Transparency ID. Its first and last seen times and distinct ads let you compare the identities against what actually appeared.
- 2:23
godotoro.com
Google's own help and API pages first. Where a point rests on how a network works and no first-party page says so, the lesson hedges it.
- Advertising Policies Help: Circumventing systems
- Google Ads Help: What happens when an account doesn't follow Google Ads policies
- Advertising Policies Help: Google Ads account suspensions overview
- Advertising Policies Help: Unfair advantage
- Advertising Policies Help: Update to the unfair advantage policy (April 2025)
- Advertising Policies Help: Ads transparency
- Advertising Policies Help: Advertiser verification
- Advertising Policies Help: Document requirements for advertiser verification
- Google Ads Help: Complete advertiser verification in bulk
- Advertising Policies Help: Trademarks
- Google Ads Help: How to report an ad
- Google Ads Help: Use auction insights to compare performance
- Google Ads API: Segments (auction insight domain)
- Analytics Help: What the value (not set) means in your reports
- Google Ads Transparency Center